Get Healthier Care Together Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811735495
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7188891028
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $208,419
- Expenses
- $265,931
- Assets
- $93,387
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKEL BRABHAM (CEO -)
Highest reported compensation
- FAYE BROWN (FINANCE SECRETARY): $36,575 total reported compensation
- KHERA BAILEY (OFFICER): $20,000 total reported compensation
- JESSINTA SMITH (KEY EMPLOYEE): $16,919 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We raise funds to support and advance healthy equity solutions impacting the health of women, children, youth and families in every category
What it reported doing in 2020
Raised donations to shift the focus of our services and Community Outreach in response to COVID19. Services included coordinating the local flow of needed & refreshed intensive care health professionals, health workers and healthy volunteers to maintain services. Reaching those in need, including individuals, families and the elderly experiencing homelessness, food shortages and COVID stricken. Assisted in establishing and maintaining remote learning for at-risk youth and families. Purchased and delivered prescription medication services Purchase and delivered food and fruits to at-risk families during COVID travel restrictions. Used our vehicle to pick up perishable and prepared food from businesses and deliver it in it vehicles directly to neighborhood food programs. Coordinated community outdoor activity to ensure Brooklyn reduce density and increase social distancing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 31
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 67.1%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 67.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $178K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.