Get Educational Resources Center Inc D/b/a New Mt Carmel Adult Day Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
542085408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Hemingway, SC, USA
Phone
8435585053
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Libraries

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,198
Expenses
$88,771
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN BROWN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JANET DOLLARD (MEMBER)
  • REV GLANNIE E TISDALE (CHAIRMAN)
  • JOHN BROWN (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Faith-based healthcare/educational

What it reported doing in 2013

New mt carmel adult day care is one program under the get educational resources center that is currently operational. We serve a maximum of 20 clients as determined by the sc department of health and environmental control. We are a medical adult daycare providing care for individuals 18 and older who are disabled or have two or more functional deficits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.2%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.2% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.