German Shepherd Dog Club of Northern Ohio Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341602733
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Mentor, OH, USA
Phone
4402271111
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,850
Expenses
$19,181
Assets
$167,489
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANEANE CAPPARA (PRESIDENT)
  • JOE BECCIA (VICE- PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER NEVILLE (BOARD MEMBER)
  • JEFF GLENN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MARK WEHAGEN (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The german shepherd dog club of northern Ohio, inc. (gsdcno) focuses on educating, promoting and supporting german shepherd dog (gsd) enthusiasts.

What it reported doing in 2024

The gsdcno educates its members by hosting meetings and round table discussions about gsd health, wellness, and nutrition. The club promotes the gsd by hosting approximately fifty (50) sporting, conformation, training and socialization classes each year. The gsdcno also supports the community by maintaining a library, donating to gsd causes and supporting local businesses. The officers and board members each devote approximately 250 volunteer hours a year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.8%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 62.5%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.9%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.73; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.8% of revenue deployed · 62.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.