German School Campus Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474952874
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
Phone
9492297389
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,444
Expenses
$120,931
Assets
$34,496
Liabilities
$114,995

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • URSULA SCHOENEICH (President)

People named in this filing

  • URSULA SCHOENEICH (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The school fosters global awareness in its students to prepare them for a productive work life and encourage appreciation of cultural diversity, and is open to all students who desire to master the German Language or to enhance the German language skills on beginner, intermediate or even advanced level.The school provide high quality German as a secon language instruction and orientation in German culture to all students, by means of an intensive activity-oriented and structured German program.The school aims to set high standards in Language education.

What it reported doing in 2023

Provide high quality teaching German language to all students.They not ony can learn German from dedicated instructors, but also have lots of fun with knowledgable cultural activities. There are rewards, and scholarships to support those who have financial needs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.33; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.