Geriatric Oncology Consortium

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200561327
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8139691722
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Expenses
$8,233
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JODY SIMON (PRESIDENT/CE)

People named in this filing

  • JODY SIMON (PRESIDENT/CE)
  • LODODICO BALDUCCI (DIRECTOR)
  • ROBERT HAUSER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the goc is to actively address age-based disparities in cancer research, education, and treatment using a national, community-based approach. As such, we strive to be the premier resource for geriatric oncology research and education.

What it reported doing in 2023

The goc has formed a strategic partnership with a medical communications company and clinical research organization (cro) to minimize overhead costs and to maximize our ability to perform quality research and educational programming. - to promote high quality research that expands knowledge of the aging process and cancer. - to conduct education programs for all healthcare professionals that promote better understanding of the unique challenges associated with the management of older adults with cancer, ultimately enhancing the quality of care for these patients. - to increase awareness of the relationship between aging and cancer, and to provide the knowleddge to empower the population to be an active partner in their healthcare decisions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: NotEnoughData
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -197.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -185.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 1 of 1 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.