Georgians United Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863137522
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6789747084
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $5,722
- Assets
- $134,936
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Frank Bobo (Co-President)
- Tracy Moore (Co-President)
People named in this filing
- Jimmy Childre (Board Chair)
- Frank Bobo (Co-President)
- Tracy Moore (Co-President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Georgians United operates exclusively for educational and charitable purposes. Georgians United's mission is to restore hope in our democracy through electoral innovation designed to incentivize problem solving and deliver results for all. We are working to address the root causes of dysfunction, gridlock and hyper-partisanship in Washington DC by making strategic changes to election rules in Georgia, to create healthy competition, incentivize problem solving, and deliver results. We promote Final-Five Voting - the innovative electoral process that pairs an open, top-5 primary with instant runoff voting in the General Election to 1) create healthy competition, 2) incentivize problem solving, and 3) create accountability to deliver results.
What it reported doing in 2025
Georgians United performs research and educates citizens on nonpartisan voting and election process innovations and reforms that advance and improve the representativeness of democracy for all constituencies in the state of Georgia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.58; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -34.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -55.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.