Georgia Vascular Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270909176
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Vestal, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8507664567
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,632
- Expenses
- $49,519
- Assets
- $126,547
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELIZABETH BURKHARDT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- J MARK RHEUDASIL MD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ELIZABETH BURKHARDT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- J MARK RHEUDASIL MD (PRESIDENT)
- DANIEL MARTIN MD (SECRETARY-TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate the public regarding the health issues associated with vascular disease and pursue the expansion of knowledge of vascular disease.
What it reported doing in 2024
To educate the public regarding the health issues associated with vascular disease and pursue the expansion of knowledge of vascular disease including conducting an annual meeting and providing medical scholarships.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 74.1%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.56; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 74.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.