Georgia Society of Health - System Pharmacists Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581428006
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Phone
8509134747
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$692,998
Expenses
$588,580
Assets
$2,345,022
Liabilities
$112,878

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

37 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA ROBERTS (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • JAELYN BENYARD (STUDENT PRESIDENT)
  • ANGEL PRUM (STUDENT PRESIDENT)
  • TAMIEKA VINSON (STUDENT PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE GLASS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DEBBIE WERTZ (DIRECTOR)
  • MEREDITH LOPEZ (DIRECTOR)
  • CHRISTY NORMAN (CHAIR OF BOARD)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advance public health by promoting the professional interest of pharmacists practicing in organzed health-care settings through fostering pharmaceutical services aimed at druge-use control and rational drug therapy, developing professional standards for pharmaceutical services, fostering an adequate supply of well trained, competent pharmacists and associated personnel, developing and conducting programs for maintaining and improving the competence of pharmacists and associated personnel, disseminating information and improving communication about pharmaceutical services and rational drug use promoting research in the health and pharmaceutical sciences and in pharmaceutical services and promoting the economic welfare of pharmacists and associated personnel.

What it reported doing in 2025

Educational conferences, meetings, and publications regarding current issues and practices in the organized health-system pharmacy field.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.98; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 35 of 35 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $577K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 37 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $115K reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.