Georgia RSVP Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850585273
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Alpharetta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4042457729
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $248,758
- Expenses
- $195,609
- Assets
- $156,270
- Liabilities
- $9,127
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Viktoriya Antonov (Executive Dir.): $70,176 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of Georgia RSVP, Inc. is to provide free outstanding rehabilitative care that maximizes independence, wellness, and community participation for uninsured people with spinal cord and acquired brain injuries. Board members and clinical specialists physicians, case managers, physical, occupational, and speech therapists are all volunteers.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Georgia RSVP Clinic is a free outpatient medical rehabilitation program for uninsured and underinsured individuals who have experienced traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, or stroke. Our clinical volunteers include physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, rehabilitation nurses, case managers, physical, occupational, and speech-language therapists, recreational therapists, psychiatrists, and peer mentors. We provide individual and group education to support families. For clients unable to attend in person due to medical or transportation barriers, we offer telehealth services to ensure access to care. Between clinic dates, we provide ongoing, comprehensive case management to address the social determinants of health, including housing, food access, transportation, and connection to vital community resources. We also assist clients in accessing essential medical supplies and equipment such as wheelchairs, hospital beds, and adaptive devices that promote safety and independence. During fiscal year 2025-2026, our volunteers dedicated 3,586 hours of clinical expertise and operational support. We held 12 clinics, one per month, and provided 618 free medical and therapy appointments. We admitted 20 new clients, served 30 clients in the clinic, and discharged 15. Clients are seen in the clinic for an average of 8 months, and some for over a year. Every client admitted to the clinic received specialized interdisciplinary therapy services. In total, we served 68 people this year, including family members who received education and individuals not formally admitted to the clinic who received information and referral and virtual case management. Of our clients, 100% were connected to the specialty medical providers and medical equipment they need, 85% were connected to the transportation services they need, and 80% reported being connected to all the specialty medical supplies they need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.8%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $188.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 43.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 42.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.8% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $151K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $70K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.