Georgia Professional Human Services Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581191962
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Watkinsville, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7062242143
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $108,558
- Expenses
- $84,170
- Assets
- $111,288
- Liabilities
- $49,348
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Susan Boatwright (Executive Director)
- Torrey Love (President-Elect)
- Jennifer Brogdon (President)
- Dede Artis (Vice-President)
Highest reported compensation
- Susan Boatwright (Executive Director): $34,626 total reported compensation
- Rhonda Floyd (Treasurer): $27,478 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to support the professional staff who serve Georgias individuals, families, and children. Our vision is stronger staff for a stronger georgia. Our association is comprised of persons who work in or are affiliated with Georgias Department of Human Services. We accomplish this mission through networking, education and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Gphsa provided one major and three additional training opportunities for human services staff. Gphsa developed a capcity to share information on the impact of major budgetary changes on the families and children served through public human services and shared this information routinely with human services staff and with board members of 159 county departments of family and children services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.5%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 73.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.5% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.