Georgia Prep Sports Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582580597
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- REX, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6786637514
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $57,000
- Expenses
- $24,000
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL CARSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL CARSON (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Georgia prep sports academy is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing post-secondary academic enrichment, athletic development, and life-skills training to young student-athletes. Our mission is to bridge the gap between high school and college by offering educational support, athletic exposure, and personal development opportunities that prepare underserved youth for success in higher education and beyond. We promote college readiness, character building, and athletic excellence to help student-athletes reach their full potential both on and off the field.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization operated a comprehensive athletic training and competition program including football skill development strength and conditioning and game film production. Athletes participated in a full competitive schedule designed to enhance recruiting visibility. This program prepared student-athletes for the rigor of collegiate sports while promoting discipline teamwork and resilience.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -41.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.