Georgia Pharmacy Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 580256890
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sandy Springs, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4042315074
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,781,753
- Expenses
- $2,281,958
- Assets
- $14,514,664
- Liabilities
- $434,926
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Joe Ed Holt (Immediate Past President)
- Ben Ross (President)
- Robert Murry (President-Elect)
- Dawn A Randolph (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Johnathan Marquess (VP of AIP): $209,742 total reported compensation
- Dawn A Randolph (CEO): $183,841 total reported compensation
- Phillip E Arrington (VP of Finance and Operations): $111,294 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and enhance the profession of pharmacy and the practice standards of its practitioners. Further, the Association shall endeavor to heighten the public's perception of the profession of pharmacy and pharmacists, and to promote the value of pharmacy services to the health and welfare of the general public.
What it reported doing in 2024
Regions and Academy Operations: (1) The Academy of Independent Pharmacy (AIP) promotes the ownership and management of independent pharmacies. To this end, AIP partners with about 40 vendors and 5 wholesalers who provide goods and services to independent pharmacies. We have approximately 400 pharmacies that are members of AIP. In addition, AIP employs 2 Member Service Representatives (MSRs) who provide regular consultation to independent pharmacies. (2) The Academy for Clinical and Health System Pharmacists (ACHP) supports members (162) who are employed by large health systems or provide consulting services. (3) The Academy of Employee Pharmacists (AEP) are those professionals working directly with patients. This academy has 330 members representing all community pharmacies across the state of Georgia. (4) The Academcy of Pharmacy Technicians (APT) is the convening academy for technicians (230). APT coordinates an annual TechU providing continuing education to ensure technicians have state of the art information and training. (5) In addition to our academies, we have 12 regions in Georgia that have meetings twice a year. Each region provides a local and accessible gathering place for pharmacists to network, obtain continuing education (CPE), and public policy information through an in-person experience.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.36; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $210K · 14 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.