Georgia Municipal Court Clerks Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205679394
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Suwanee, GA, USA
Phone
7705382486
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,645
Expenses
$26,902
Assets
$28,822

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Angela Cocharan (President)
  • Kristan T Ewing (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Angela Cocharan (President)
  • Kristan T Ewing (Vice President)
  • Julie Cogins (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To always support the goals and objectives of the Council of Municipal Court Judges of Georgia and the Georgia Municipal Courts Training Council; To serve as a conduit to State organizations and among courts; To offer training and educational opportunities; To promulgate professional and ethical standards; and, To provide the courts access to performance qualification standards and evaluation procedures, and best practices in court operations and accounting procedures.

What it reported doing in 2023

To always support the goals and achievements of the Council of Municipal Court Judges of Georgia and the Georgia Municipal Courts Training Council; To serve as a conduit to State organizations and among courts; To offer training and educational opportunities; To promulgate professional and ethical standards; and, To provide the courts access to performance qualification standards and evaluation procedures, and best practices in court operations and accounting procedures.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 39.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.