Georgia Mountains & Lakes Realtors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582144561
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4048454024
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,704
- Expenses
- $107,040
- Assets
- $185,056
- Liabilities
- $61,739
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Claudia Lyle (President)
- Dee Dee Arrowood (President Elect)
- Roger Glenn (Past President)
- Reggie McCrary (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Claudia Lyle (President)
- Dee Dee Arrowood (President Elect)
- Roger Glenn (Past President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To maintain high standards of conduct and to safeguard the interests of Real Estate Professionals by providing continuing education and upholding a code of professional conduct and ethics. To further the interests of home and real property ownership.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provides networking opportunities and membership luncheons with a variety of speakers providing informative content for the members to use in their business.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.6%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 18.4%; rating input score 18
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.6% of revenue deployed · 18.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.