Georgia Community Water Sports Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582052391
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Richmond Hill, GA, USA
Phone
9124291804
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Olympics

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,313
Expenses
$49,905
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAN ROHDE (CHAIRMAN)
  • KELLY PETROU (VICE-CHAIRMA)
  • SEAN REGISTER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a volunteer, community based, non-profit 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to promoting the sport of sailing. We are committed to community -wide participation through outreach programs emphasizing youth, learn to sail, and race training.

What it reported doing in 2022

Ssc offers various sailing programs throughout the year reaching over 300 children and adults. Our saturday lessons are given during the year for adult's and children of all ages and different sailing abilities. We offer full day summer camp lessons which help the younger children learn to sail. During the school year we offer competative sailing lessons with coaches for our high school and college teams. To secure instructor's for ssc we conduct an instructor's course which is certified by the us sailing association. We also have offered special classes for several civic groups as an introduction to sailing. We have offered a middle/elementary school program in the fall and spring to attract the younger sailor and get them ready to compete at the high school level. We offer a regatta for children with autism, to give back to the community, and is free of charge for the families with these children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3,700.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.