Georgia Civil Justice Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581789012
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Milton, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4045222744
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,519,686
- Expenses
- $253,673
- Assets
- $4,990,719
- Liabilities
- $15,434
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBIN FRAZER CLARK (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- FRED H SMITH (EXEC. DIRECT): $53,333 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide and fund a variety of programs and services to educate Georgia citizens about the civil justice system
What it reported doing in 2025
Law related education - produced numerous podcasts moderated and taught by leading attorneys and judges on a variety of topics surrounding the civil justice system; also helped fund other Georgia not-for-profit organizations to educate Georgia citizens about the civil justice system explaining legal information on a variety of topics for a variety of audiences.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.7%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 83.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.67; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.7% of revenue deployed · 96.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $244K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.