Georgia Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260708412
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010, Form 990-N 2007
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4042232268
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,871,929
Expenses
$2,940,330
Assets
$1,668,993
Liabilities
$1,922,208

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES C CLARK JR (CEO/PRESIDENT)
  • DANIELA PERRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES C CLARK JR (CEO/PRESIDENT): $848,258 total reported compensation
  • STEPHANIE MARTIN (TREASURER, CFO): $296,442 total reported compensation
  • DANIELA PERRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $160,504 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Georgia chamber of commerce foundation undertakes activities, which educate the public on subjects useful to the individual and beneficial to the community the foundation primarily focuses on the issues of health care and work force development in the state of Georgia. The foundation promotes development of policies in Georgia which address the crisis in health care financing and its impact on Georgia businesses and employees. The foundation also is involved in activities to improve the training and marketability of Georgia's work force to bring healthy economic growth to all parts of the state

What it reported doing in 2024

The Georgia chamber of commerce foundation, the research arm of the Georgia chamber of commerce, dedicates itself to producing in-depth economic analysis, actionable insights, and proactive solutions to better prepare Georgia's business and community leaders for our future challenges, increasing the state's competitiveness and economic prosperity. In 2024 the Georgia chamber foundation produced its second economic competitiveness redbook which provides economic and demographic data to compare Georgia to every other state in the nation to analyze opportunities for strategic investments to propel the state forward. An updated format was utilized to ensure the content was highly engaging and provided top insights for business leadership. County level data was also included to enable local leaders to have tailored insights to understand the greatest challenges and strengths of their communities. Along those same lines, the foundation also produced its second executive insights survey, which garnered feedback from top business leaders about the top opportunities for the state of Georgia to continue strong economic growth. This year's survey included year over year insights which was very valuable to better understand which issues are consistently top of mind. Additionally, the foundation produced quarterly economic reports centered around the chamber's strategic plan to give stakeholders a clear picture of where solutions are needed to further economic prosperity. Research was also released on the state of housing in Georgia as a result of the work of the housing affordability and access task force that convened in 2023. The foundation convened members through 6 policy committees and 3 policy councils to discuss key issues and emerging trends and establish actionable solutions to move forward. New in 2024, the foundation hosted curated luncheons on the topics of workforce development and freight and logistics transportation to highlight the research of the foundation and ensure members and partners were aware of actionable solutions and next steps. The future of small business was another new event supported by the research of the foundation that was launched in 2024. Foundation staff provided testimony to numerous Georgia general assembly study committees on workforce and small business issues. In 2024, the foundation received investment for two grant projects to support k-12 workforce development initiatives. First, the Georgia department of education provided funds allowing the Georgia chamber foundation to deploy more than $2 million dollars to 64 rural school districts for their workforce preparedness programs. The foundation also received $50,000 from truist charitable fund to support increased access to skilled trades training programs and entrepreneurial education through, be pro be proud and flex Georgia, two partners of the Georgia chamber.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 69% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 51%; rating input score 51; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.15; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $848K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 37 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.