Georgia Association for Marriage & Family Therapy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
580063414
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
6786643233
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$123,574
Expenses
$75,357
Assets
$167,843
Liabilities
$3,965

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW BENESH (PRESIDENT EL)
  • KARA MCDANIEL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH BIZZELL (VP)
  • JETLEXIS CARLOS (TREASURER)
  • DIANN STUART (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote common professional interests of those who are marital and family therapists, to represent marriage and family therapy as a mental health profession to the public and before government bodies in Georgia, to establish and maintain professional standards in marriage and family therapy in Georgia, to cooperate with other organizations and agencies for the furtherance of the marriage and family therapy profession, and to further these objectives by meetings, clinical sessions, publications, research in the field, and other relevant activities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program service accomplishments: spring and winter conference revenues are used to pay for the conferences attended by members and non-members. Any remaining net revenues are used to promote the general programs of the organization by promoting common professional interests of those who are marital and family therapists and to establish and maintain professional standards in marriage and family therapy in Georgia. The conferences consist of workshops and seminars for the professional development of attendees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.23; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.