Georgia Agritourism Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452691530
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Lagrange, GA, USA
Phone
7068459085
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$89,368
Expenses
$83,279
Assets
$40,072
Liabilities
$17,903

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CYNDE DICKEY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CYNDE DICKEY (PRESIDENT)
  • CAROLINE LEWALLEN (1ST VICE PRE)
  • RODNEY MILLER (2ND VICE PRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Georgia agritourism association's mission is to facilitate and create new economic growth opportunities for its members (and the state of Georgia) through increased agritourism and profitable agribusinesses by: enabling, supporting, and promoting Georgia's agritourism enterprises; educating and informing its constituents on the value of agritourism; and encouraging the highest standards of hospitality and business practices.

What it reported doing in 2017

The Georgia agritourism association's mission is to facilitate and create new economic growth opportunities for its members (and the state of Georgia) through increased agritourism and profitable agribusinesses by: enabling, supporting, and promoting Georgia's agritourism enterprises; educating and informing its constituents on the value of agritourism; and encouraging the highest standards of hospitality and business practices. The association held an annual conference and educational meetings to support its mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.