Georgia Academy of Audiology Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010644341
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
7063246112
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$68,806
Expenses
$71,484
Assets
$46,655

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MERYL MILLER (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • RYAN HANKLA (PRESIDENTT)
  • FELICIA THOMAS (PAST PRESIDE)
  • MERYL MILLER (PRESIDENT EL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Georgia academy of audiology is a professional organization of audiologists and friends of the audiology community that promotes quality hearing and balanced care by advancing the profession of audiology through leadership, advocacy, education, public awareness, and support of research.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Georgia academy of audiology (gaa) held its annual convention on february 6-7, 2025, at the westin atlanta perimeter north. There were 65 attendees, most of whom were gaa members, but the invitation was offered to nonmembers. There were 16 sponsors and 1 exhibitor for the 2025 conference. Continuing education hours are required for state of Georgia licensure and for membership to professional organizations such as the american academy of audiology (aaa) and the american speech hearing and language association (asha). This year's continuing education courses covered a wide range of topics including the following: evolving hearing needs as we age complex audiologic cases in medical settings cochlear implants coding and billing tinnitus management business growth insights & emerging vestibular research

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 28
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.7%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.7% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.