George Steinbrenner High School Athletic Booster Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270424178
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lutz, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8137925131
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $488,811
- Expenses
- $456,643
- Assets
- $122,990
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER GREEN (President)
- MAURA WEINS (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER GREEN (President)
- MAURA WEINS (Vice President)
- MICHELE DAVIS (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve the student athlete & build athletic excellence
What it reported doing in 2024
George steinbrenner high school athletic booster club inc is a registerd not-for-profit 501(c)(3) exempt corporation whose primary purpose is to serve the student athlete and build athletic excellence. It encourages student participation in athletics. The involvement includes: 1)providing money in college scholarships to student athletes 2)funding and executing award banquets for all sports seasons throughout the year 3)hosting concessions and enabling sports teams to raise funds for their individual sports 4)funding memberships to faca 5)funding the annual athletic director conferences 6)assisting with raising money for all sports to purchase supplies, equipment, uniforms and/or capital items beyond what the school athletic budget provides 7)managing all teams raised funds, maintaining fiscal stewardship of the money.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $388K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.