Gentle Giants Draft Horse Rescue Society Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593822764
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Mount Airy, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4434637084
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,704,633
- Expenses
- $8,822,206
- Assets
- $16,060,397
- Liabilities
- $3,564,486
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINE HAJEK (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTINE HAJEK (PRESIDENT): $269,615 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To save draft horses from slaughter, abuse, and neglect, and finding them adoptive homes as trail and schooling horses.
What it reported doing in 2025
Gentle giants draft horse rescue furthers its mission by also assisting humane law enforcement organizations across the united states by offering control and custody during litigations of abuse and neglect, we are often able to offer this resource at no cost to the humane law enforcement organization, further empowering them to enforce animal welfare law and protect more horses. We also offer our rescue services to private owners of horses who find themselves unable to provide adequate nutrition and/or medical care to the animals they possess, preventing those animals from further neglect or suffering and keeping more horses out of the horse slaughter auction pipeline. Gentle giants operates several public safety net programs to assist animals in need, such as operation geld - a certificate based financial assistance for equine castrations within the state of Maryland; Maryland hay bank - which provides support of hay to private owners facing a temporary financial crisis to assist the horse owner during a brief period of need, and to keep horses in homes; euthanasia assistance - to financially provide for veterinary administered humane euthanasia of horses in extreme states of illness and injury in which rehabilitation would be impossible or even cruel, preventing horses with grave injuries like broken legs, those who are of advanced age, or those in late-stage illness from suffering the additional horror of languishing in their current state or being shipped to slaughter in their fragile condition. Gentle giants also extends donation-based technical large animal rescue services within a two-hour radius of our facility. Gentle giants reaches hundreds of thousands of people annually to educate them on the horror of horse slaughter through public expositions and presentations, clinics, speaking engagements, tours, social media platforms, web-based information, email, direct mail, and telephone. In 2019, gentle giants reached 1,953,905 individual americans to make them aware of the fate of unwanted horses in the united states. 59,381 people joined membership in gentle giants, returning 118,762 signed petitions to the speaker of the house to stop the export of horses for slaughter. Gentle giants is also active in the Maryland horse council, the Maryland horse industry board, and Maryland association of rescues and equine sanctuaries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.2%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.6%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.82; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.2% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $270K · 6 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.