GenImpact Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 332407220
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Lilburn, GA, USA
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $510,185
- Expenses
- $271,368
- Assets
- $256,657
- Liabilities
- $2,740
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Barry St Clair (President)
- Josh Smith (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Barry St Clair (President): $137,415 total reported compensation
- Lawanna St Clair (Secretary): $80,000 total reported compensation
- Kevin Miles (Treasurer): $7,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As a religious, educational and charitable organization, GenImpact is focused on training and teaching the next generation to become mature and ardent followers of Christ. This training is led by Dr. St. Clair who has over 55 years of experience discipling the next generation. Training of the youth and their leaders is performed via Zoom on a daily basis using curriculum from the 35 books he has written on leadership and growing in faith. Having extensive experience in training youth and their leaders, Dr. St. Clair identifies potential volunteer leaders who will in turn train and disciple the next generation. Each of the leaders reports to the indigenous leader on the ground in his/her country. Those indigenous leaders send regular reports and updates on each trainee for a full accounting. Currently, he trains these leaders via Zoom throughout Kenya and Nigeria on a daily basis.
What it reported doing in 2025
As a religious, educational and charitable organization the focus has been training and teaching the next generation. Dr. St. Clair has fully identified potential volunteer leaders who now train and disciple the next generation. Each of them reports directly to his/her indigenous leader who then reports progress to Barry each week. Currently, there are over 2200 leaders trained throughout the 47 counties (equivalent to states in the US) in Kenya from north of the Rift Valley to southern Samburu. In Nigeria, there have been over 860 leaders trained from the Northen plains to the Southern capital of Abuja. Jos, Nigeria has been a primary focal point of training for the last two years due to the heavy infiltration of new tribes from the north who are displaced due to violence and persecution of Christians.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.1%; rating input score 25
- Program expense ratio: 47.3%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.1% of revenue deployed · 47.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $137K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.