Genesis Recovery Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463086581
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- La Mesa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6197977319
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $316,818
- Expenses
- $64,977
- Assets
- $343,537
- Liabilities
- $171,900
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE HAYDEN (President)
People named in this filing
- JULIE HAYDEN (President)
- ERNIE GEORGGIN (Director)
- GREG HENDRICKS (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Genesis recovery, inc. Was formed for the purpose of providing a zero tolerance environment in which individuals can commence recovery from alcohol and substance abuse utilizing a christian based solution to addictive behaviors and supplemented by twelve step recovery program meetings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.9%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 79.5%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.29; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.9% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.