Generation US
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821449889
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Augusta, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2076207180
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,278,740
- Expenses
- $1,907,347
- Assets
- $6,676,502
- Liabilities
- $297,863
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Craig Larrabee (President & CEO)
- Kimberley Lipp (Executive Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Craig Larrabee (President & CEO): $408,197 total reported compensation
- Kimberley Lipp (Executive Vice President): $363,117 total reported compensation
- Greg Johnson (VP - Finance & Administrat): $246,095 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Generation US purpose is to support and benefit Jobs for Maine's Graduates (JMG), a Maine non-profit organization. It conducts fundraising activities aimed at both generating funds for and also to cover expenses related to activities carried on by the organization. The Organization also conducts development and administrative services that will be offered to the organization in order to allow it to shift focus away from day to day administrative tasks.
What it reported doing in 2024
Generation US conducts fundraising activities aimed at both generating funds for JMG and also to cover expenses related to activites carried on by the Organization. Generation US also conducts development and administrative services that will be offered to JMG in order to allow them to shift focus away from day to day administrative tasks. The development and administrative services involve fundraising initiatives, back office support, and strategic planning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.7%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 30
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.5; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 63.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.7% of revenue deployed · 30.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $580K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $408K · 11 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.