Generation Tx San Antonio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274512789
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2108286281
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $202,490
- Expenses
- $292,134
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AL SILVA (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN OF THE)
- MARI AGUIRRE RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARI AGUIRRE RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $105,093 total reported compensation
- ANNABELL HALL (CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER): $45,625 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Generation tx san antonio is committed to making san antonio a college-going and career-ready community in a single generation. Generation tx san antonio serves as a hub for community coordination of resources to prepare san antonio students for college and careers, and provides a focused marketing effort, curriculum of in-school messaging, and events to inspire and ignite a shared commitment to producing the most successful generation of san antonio students ever.
What it reported doing in 2013
The sa ready program has served more than 10,000 individuals. This is an in-school curriculum developed in partnership between generation tx san antonio and educational policy improvement center research that is aligned with Texas college and career readiness standards (tccrs). Gentx sa has organized a task force of curricula specialists and educators from five local school districts and challenged them to develop an instructional thread that helps students acquire the tccrs, as well as dr. David conley's four key dimensions of college and career readiness.the grassroots events (seasons of college) served more than 2,000 individuals. This is a thematic events calendar that focuses on the seasonal aspects of college and career-readiness. The calendar features nine unique themes that address all aspects of the college cycle including planning and research, applications, financial aid and career exploration. Each event is high-energy, memorable and full of rich college access content. The seasons of college events aim to inspire and inform san antonio students of all ages. Students walk away from events with actionable information they can use to ensure they are prepared to enter college.gentxperts is a partnership between schools and generation tx san antonio dedicated to using proven youth development principals to enhance college and career readiness in low-income, typically first generation students. A gentxpert is defined as a student who embodies the gentx culture and is committed to fueling the college-going movement in their school.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -44.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -52.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -35.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $255K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $105K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.