General Truck Drivers Office Food
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951586304
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Orange, CA, USA
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,776,298
- Expenses
- $8,604,511
- Assets
- $4,935,181
- Liabilities
- $878,209
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- J GREEN (PRESIDENT)
- D HERBERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- E JIMENEZ (SECRETARY-TREASURER): $226,115 total reported compensation
- F SEVILLA (ORGANIZER): $223,078 total reported compensation
- J GREEN (PRESIDENT): $215,298 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions, and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations and collective bargaining.
What it reported doing in 2025
Membership dues and assessments provide the means to accomplish the organizations objectives as provided for under its by laws and international constitution. Rental of excess real property provides additional operating revenue used to reduce expenses. Short term investments provides income and prudent use of membership funds.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 62.4%; rating input score 62; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.9%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $226K · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $307K reported
- Consistency: 15 of 17 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.