General Federation of Womens Clubs of South Carolina

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570963980
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Chapin, SC, USA
Phone
8033700158
Rating
94
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,416
Expenses
$89,519
Assets
$56,379

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATTY AUKES (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PATTY AUKES (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINE ZINN (FIRST VICE P)
  • TERESA WOODS (SECOND VICE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Chapin woman's club is organized for the purpose of bringing together and equipping women to promote civic progress in the town, state, nation and world; with specific emphasis on the needs of our community.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the 2025-2026 club year, chapin woman's club donated 50,450 to nonprofit organizations in the chapin, sc area. Donation detail: boys farm 10,000 chapin community theatre 5,000 chapin we care 6,000 columbia marionette theatre 300 courage center 1,875 crooked creek art league 2,500 crooked creek park 1,500 friends of the chapin branch library 925 homeward bound 2,000 icrc meals on wheels 400 lake murray elementary school 1,500 lighthouse for life 5,000 midlands orphan relief 2,300 percy's angelic cat rescue 2,000 screaming eagles special needs athletics 1,375 sistercare 5,000 snug harbor 1,400 st. Francis of assisi 500 uso 375 wreaths across america 500

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 69% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 92% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $78K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.