General Federation of Womens Clubs
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860216532
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5204199399
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $189,265
- Expenses
- $109,839
- Assets
- $185,710
- Liabilities
- $3,193
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANNA SWENSON (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- SUE WEBB-TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
- DIANNE MAKI-SETHI (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARTHA MEGERLE (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)
- TEDI ROWDEN (4TH VICE PRESIDENT)
- CLAUDIA WRIGHT (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DIANNA SWENSON (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- SUE WEBB-TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
- DIANNE MAKI-SETHI (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided a facility for community social/civil activities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.9%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $110K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.