General Federation of Women's Clubs Wisconsin Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 396044695
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Beloit, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6302098198
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $136,110
- Expenses
- $119,328
- Assets
- $409,306
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA BROWN (PRESIDENT)
- ERIN EPPING (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- SHELLY ISELY (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LINDA BROWN (PRESIDENT)
- ERIN EPPING (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- SHELLY ISELY (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Statewide volunteer community service organization that promotes individual growth and provides education and training to enrich the quality of life in state communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Scholarships to students pursuing health related careersmarquette university - f/b/o m stephens - $1000university of Wisconsin - madison f/b/om metzler - $1000university of Wisconsin - eau claire - f/b/o s waalen - $1000valparaiso university - f/b/o a higbee - $1000
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.3%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 36.9%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.43; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.3% of revenue deployed · 36.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $44K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.