Genderbands
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814259877
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Orem, UT, USA
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,990
- Expenses
- $91,951
- Assets
- $125,446
- Liabilities
- $5,911
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ian Giles (President)
- Luann Hawker (Vice President of Records)
- Jodi Dunn (Vice President of Marketing)
People named in this filing
- Ian Giles (President)
- Luann Hawker (Vice President of Records)
- Jodi Dunn (Vice President of Marketing)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Supporting Gender Affirmation Surgery
What it reported doing in 2022
Grants: Awarding financial assistance for gender affirming procedures
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 9
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.1%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 8
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -27.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.1% of revenue deployed · 7.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.