Gender IDEAL Inc Dba Reproductive & Maternal Health Com
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850660632
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6072697697
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $476,250
- Expenses
- $493,707
- Assets
- $248,943
- Liabilities
- $15,750
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Florence Wilson (CEO & Founder)
Highest reported compensation
- Florence Wilson (CEO & Founder): $73,846 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Gender IDEAL launched the Reproductive & Maternal Health Compass. RMH Compass works to support and protect reproductive and maternal health (RMH) benefits for all workers in the U.S. by engaging with employers to assess and expand their RMH benefits. Gender IDEAL is focused on the health and well-being of all workers and celebrate employers who raise the bar on what providing best-in-class RMH benefits looks like at work. Gender IDEAL products and services, including a performance standard, benchmark reports, and a resource hub for employers, set the standard for what best-in-class RMH benefits look like in practice.
What it reported doing in 2025
Gender IDEAL, Inc., advocates for a future of work that is truly IDEAL-inclusive, diverse, and equitable in access and leadership opportunities-for all genders. Its focus is on supporting women of color, women of diverse sexual orientations, gender identities, religions, economic backgrounds, and abilities. The organization is placing a special emphasis on the critical need to support and protect the reproductive and maternal health of American workers.In 2025, RMH Compass expanded this work through the launch of the RMH@Work Corporate Trends Bulletins, evolving the original index into an ongoing series designed to track year-over-year progress in reproductive and maternal health benefits across major U.S. employers. The 2025 bulletins incorporated updated employer submissions, expanded qualitative insights, and deeper analysis of emerging trends and best practices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 60.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 28.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $484K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.