Gehringer Park Swim Team Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331255325
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Pittsburg, CA, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,945
Expenses
$73,401
Assets
$25,544

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brooke Giordano (President)
  • Laura Wallbridge (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brooke Giordano (President)
  • Laura Wallbridge (Vice President)
  • Andrea Berg-LeDoux (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Gehringer Park Swim Team Inc. seeks to refine the skills of young swimmers to assist young swim members of as swim team with varying ages to enjoy swimming and have fun and to develop character and good sportsmanship through self-discipline as an individual and team efforts.

What it reported doing in 2024

GPST Inc. operated a recreational swim team for youth swimmers ages 4-18 with a focus on stroke development competitive swimming and promoting sportsmanship. The program provided regular swim practices coaching and opportunities to participate in local recreational and invitational wwim meets. Swimmers received instruction on proper techniques in all four competitive strokes freestyle backstroke breaststroke and butterfly and were encouraged to improve personal performance and team spirit. The swim season runs from April - early August and served approximately180 youth participants. The program emphasized participation healthy competition physical fitness and character development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 60% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.