Gccs Educational Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352077348
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jeffersonville, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8122884802
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $470,769
- Expenses
- $388,806
- Assets
- $455,728
- Liabilities
- $4,342
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILY OLIVER-JONES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- EMILY OLIVER-JONES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $83,612 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The core purpose of the gccs educational foundation is to improve student outcomes and the learning of every student in every school, in collaboration with district leadership, by engaging the support of businesses and the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational oppurtunities programs: teacher supply bus - this initiative helps teachers obtain the necessary supplies in the classroom in an effort to help their students to be equipped and ready to learn. The bus tours each of the schools in the greater clark county school corporation and allows educators to hop on and "shop" for the supplies they need most.s.t.e.m. Summer camps - this initiative helps provide support to the robotics & rube goldberg clubs at each of our schools. Across greater clark county schools we have robotics teams in every elementary and middle school. Every year vex robotics announces a robotics challenge. This challenge is focused around students designing a robot that will complete a task through an obstacle course or field. The clubs meet for several months to complete their robot design work. The gccs students then gather together for a district wide competition where teams will compete to complete the robotics challenge in the fastest time. Some of our teams go on to the vex robotics state competition. The rube goldberg club allows students to work in teams and use their creativity to build machines made out of basic household items. Students learn about levers, pulleys, inclines, and more to make their machine function. The students come together for a district wide competition where they present their machines to an audience and judges. The arts in greater clark - this initiative provides grant funding opportunities to all arts in greater clark. Our annual women for greater event supports the funding opportunities available. Because of the support of our donors we have been able to fund musical instruments, sound equipment, theater art performances, sheet music for hispanic students, and much more. We have put water color paints, clay, glaze, and other art related materials into our art classroom from kindergarten to 12th grade.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $144.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.4%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $317K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.