Gateway Rehabilitation Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251204418
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Moon Township, PA, USA
Phone
4126048900
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$55,997,255
Expenses
$56,730,548
Assets
$41,810,728
Liabilities
$27,156,376

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD TROUP (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • LAURA BISBEY (REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD TROUP (PRESIDENT & CEO): $465,661 total reported compensation
  • JULIA D'ALO MD (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $351,420 total reported compensation
  • GINA GOSZINSKI (PSYCHIATRIST): $328,620 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Gateway rehabilitation center (grc) provides comprehensive addiction treatment services with a focus on integrated mental health and physical healthcare for individuals experiencing substance use disorders (sud) and co-occurring conditions. The organization operates an advanced recovery network in Pennsylvania that includes approximately 600 residential treatment beds, 9 outpatient treatment locations, state-wide telehealth and telepsychiatry services, and specialized treatment programs for individuals with co-occurring sud and mental health disorders. Grc also provides behavioral health services within forensic-focused settings and operates an employee assistance program (eap) serving employers and their workforces throughout the tri-state area. Gateway employs more than 600 staff across clinical, medical, and administrative roles dedicated to delivering evidence-based treatment and recovery services to thousands of individuals annually. During the year, the organization strengthened its clinical and operational infrastructure by implementing a system-wide electronic health record, expanding residential treatment capacity for individuals with co-occurring disorders, launching an adolescent residential treatment program, and developing a physician services practice to better integrate medical care into addiction treatment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.65; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.9% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $466K · 29 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.5M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.