Gatepost Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200804980
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025631720
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Day Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,036
- Expenses
- $18,268
- Assets
- $1,824
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Susan Ironfield (Vice President)
- Craig Clinton (President)
- Theresa Mullen (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Susan Ironfield (Vice President)
- Craig Clinton (President)
- Allen Burris (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Youth Development
What it reported doing in 2020
Due to the Covid restrictions we were not able to run our programs past March. Only 18 young people were served from January to March. Other activities included Food distribution to 500 people every two weeks from June through September. Food was donated from Federal programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 7
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.7%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 6
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.7% of revenue deployed · 6.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.