Gate of Abundant Life Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
393773242
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Edmond, OK, USA
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,457
Expenses
$6,280
Assets
$71,177

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ed Ford (President)
  • Nancy Brown (Vice President)
  • Nancy Brown (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ed Ford (President)
  • Nancy Brown (Vice President)
  • Nancy Brown (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create sacred spaces where lay Christian pilgrims find rest and renewal individuals deepen their spiritual journey and community is fostered through works of mercy offered to people in all stages of life.

What it reported doing in 2025

The second primary activity for GALA in 2025 was to identify a property for use near Assisi Italy. A property was identified. GALA at first intended to purchase the property itself but lacked sufficient funds. GALA received an inspection report and estimates on costs to renovate the property. Then a donor offered to purchase the property and let GALA use it via a rental agreement. The purchase transaction and rental agreement are expected in 2026.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.3%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 91.9%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.33; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.