Garth Woods Conservancy on the Bronx River Parkway Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
134031516
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Bronx, NY, USA
Phone
9147254600
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management

Reported finances

Revenue
$255
Expenses
$2,427
Assets
$95
Liabilities
$5,592

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEAN BORG (PRESIDENT)
  • BARRY KRAMER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TERRI GIFFORD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOANNE SIGNORINI (ACTING CHAIRPERSON)
  • DEAN BORG (PRESIDENT)
  • BARRY KRAMER (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Restores, improves and protects the garth woods area around the vecinity of the bronx river parkway

What it reported doing in 2017

Restores, improves and protects the Garth Woods Area around the surrounding vecinity of the Bronx River Parway. Continually took the necessary steps to maintain and improve the Garth Woods Conservancy located along the Bronx River

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -851.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 58.86; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 66.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.