Garden City South Post No 325 Veterans
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 116017684
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Garden City, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5164860911
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,389
- Expenses
- $34,773
- Assets
- $141,917
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PASQUALE ARGENZIO (PRESIDENT/COMMANDER)
People named in this filing
- PASQUALE ARGENZIO (PRESIDENT/COMMANDER)
- RICHARD R VENTIMIGLIA (SENIOR VICE COMMANDER)
- RUDOLPH GENOVESI (JUNIOR VICE COMMANDER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule 0
What it reported doing in 2024
To organize and form a group of persons, most of whom shall have as their background past service overseas in branches of the armed forces of the united states of america. To promote good fellowship, to serve as a basis for renewing and developing acquaintes and friendship and to serve as a construction agency for the better of the communiteies in which the corpation shall be located. To promote social gatherings and lectures, among the members as a means of whole recreation, education, and entertainment endeavors, all conductive to better community living. To promote, preserve, and strenghten comradship among its members, to assist worthy comrades, to perpetuate the memory and history of our dead and to assist their widows, orphans and immediate families. To maintain true allegiance to the gov. Of the united states of america, and fidelity to its constitution and laws. To poster true patriotism and to maintain and extend institutions of american freedom.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,403.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.08; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -44.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.