Gap Community Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862529146
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5208778077
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,978,187
- Expenses
- $9,044,230
- Assets
- $382,534
- Liabilities
- $448,577
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Greg Ayers (President)
- Pam Ayers (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Greg Ayers (President): $126,634 total reported compensation
- Pam Ayers (Executive Director): $125,569 total reported compensation
- Jason Ayers (Non-Voting Director): $79,391 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
GAP Community Services - Part lll - Organizations primary exempt purpose The Vision of GAP Community Services is to address, educate, coordinate, and provide services to underprivileged and underserved members of our community in achieving their full potential as individuals, as responsible citizens, and as members of the greater community. As an organization, we are passionate about helping others.
What it reported doing in 2024
GAP Kitchen was born out of a practical need to reclaim thousands of pounds of quality, highly-perishable food donated to us through strategic alliances with local and corporate vendors. Gap Kitchen provides meals to children, the elderly and individuals in need. Gap kitchen accomplishes this through catering services, culinary job training programs and partnerships with schools, daycare providers and others in the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.17; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 189.8% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $127K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 45 of 45 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.