Gallatin Performance Academy Inc Dba Montana Futbol Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833611480
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Bozeman, MT, USA
Phone
4065797044
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,294
Expenses
$16,293
Assets
$34,912

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HUNTER TERRY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • HUNTER TERRY (Vice President)
  • SIOBHAN GILLMARTIN (Chairman)
  • TODD CALOW (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Montana Futbol Foundation champions the development of new or established programs that align with our vision. We support soccer players, referees and programs in Montana with funding, mentorship, and community and global service opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Montana Futbol Foundation is passionate about prospecting ways to serve others through soccer based events. GFF's futbol service event will be a multi-day service trip where 20 players will travel to Tanzania to help build a soccer pitch, coach the young disadvantaged Tanzanian youth players, provide physical training techniques, and share first aid training methods.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.6%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 62.4%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.14; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -62.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 45% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.