G1 Training and Fitness

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922442715
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Moreno Valley, CA, USA
Phone
9512879867
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Physical Fitness and Community Recreational Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,000
Expenses
$43,115
Assets
$7,985

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Andre Saulsberry (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Ashley Saulsberry (CFO)
  • Beverly Barber (Secretary)
  • Andre Saulsberry (CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Youth Sports Organization

What it reported doing in 2024

G1 Track & Field provided year-round athletic training, mentorship, and academic support to over 100 underserved youth in Moreno Valley, ages 516. The program focused on developing discipline, leadership, and healthy habits through structured practices, local and regional competitions, and team-building events. G1 also offered academic tutoring, character development sessions, and family outreach. The program helped keep youth engaged and off the streets while promoting fitness, teamwork, and positive life choices.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.8%; rating input score 44
  • Program expense ratio: 48.7%; rating input score 49

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 165.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 158.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 88.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.8% of revenue deployed · 48.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.