Fwc Officers Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871143684
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Tallahassee, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8505180209
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $589,513
- Expenses
- $324,679
- Assets
- $836,505
- Liabilities
- $3,648
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLES E BOYD III (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BREWSTER BEVIS (DIRECTOR)
- IGNACIO BORBOLLA (DIRECTOR)
- JACK DAUGHERTY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring together persons engaged in the enforcement and support of fish and wildlife laws in the state of Florida with other persons interested in conservation of Florida's fish and wildlife. To promote professionalism of members within the Florida fish and wildlife conservation commission's division of law enforcement by inspiring a just pride in their work, by promoting and sponsoring adequate educational programs beneficial to the association membership and citizens of the state of Florida, to advance the social and economic welfare of its members, foster fraternal relationships between members and the department during and after retirement, provide comfort and assistance to members and their families in time of need, to provide individual benefits for the members, to support legislative and retirement matters.
What it reported doing in 2024
To bring together persons engaged in the enforcement and support of fish and wildlife laws in the state of Florida with other persons interested in conservation of Florida's fish and wildlife.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.2%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.9%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.58; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.2% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $300K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.