Fwa of New York Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133092258
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2125332141
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $643,908
- Expenses
- $985,647
- Assets
- $4,436,011
- Liabilities
- $135,459
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNETTE STEWART (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- PAWNEET ABRAMOWSKI (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- ALISSA DESMARAIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & COO, EX OFFICIO)
- ALBANA THEKA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ALISSA DESMARAIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & COO, EX OFFICIO): $206,812 total reported compensation
- MEREDITH MCGFIFF (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS & TECHNOLOGY): $132,046 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote the professional development and advancement of all women through education, mentorship, networking, alliances, and advocacy across the financial sector.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational initiatives/next generation programs- see schedule othe fwa is dedicated to building the next generation of women in leadership in finance by building a pipeline of talented young women interested in and ready for careers in finance. Our programs, increase access to education through college readiness, mentorship, leadership professional acumen and skills development and network building. The fwa also provides significant financial support through scholarships, stipends and study abroad support. Key accomplishments and statistics for the fy25 fiscal year: fwa scholars program- high school of economics and finance: paired 7 mentees with 7 mentors providing personal guidance on college and career readiness.- awarded 10 fwa scholarships to students enrolled at 7 colleges/universities. Fwa mentorship and scholarship at baruch college- paired and supported 43 female students with fwa mentors, scholarships and stipends.- 250 graduate students received advanced skills finance training and 20 graduate students received stipends. Fwa mentorship and scholarship at seton hall university, stillman school of business- supported 30 students with fwa mentors, scholarshipswall street exchange fwa's internship augmentation program for rising juniors interning in finance positions. The program engages participants in the fwa mission and provides workshops in professionalism, leadership, and career management techniques.- 58 students from 46 colleges/universities interning at 32 companies nationwide.member programsthe fwa provides its members with a wide array of professional education and career development programs. Through participating in these activities, professionals advance their leadership skills, industry knowledge and build their professional network. Fwa programs actively help to accelerate the success of all women in the financial sector.in the fy25 fiscal year the fwa presented 64 events with a total registered attendance of 1,928 people. Content was developed through our vibrant member program committees: directorship and corporate governance, emerging leaders, entrepreneurs, fintech, fwa long island, fwa New Jersey, global agenda, international business conference, impact investing, men's alliance, member2member, mentorship, signature eventsthe fwa also works with corporate partners to identify, support and develop high potential employees through our proprietary pacesetters program. In the fy25 program the fwa supported a diverse cohort of 18 women from 10 financial institutions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.8%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -53.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.5; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 24 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $776K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $207K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.