Futbol Tech Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921638575
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Greenacres, FL, USA
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,805
Expenses
$78,011
Assets
$44,711
Liabilities
$2,744

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cesar Henao (President)
  • Dana Endicott (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Cesar Henao (President)
  • Dana Endicott (Vice President)
  • Mario Alberto Agudelo (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Help and support at-risk youth in vulnerable areas through soccer English and technology education. Provide support to non-profits focused on helping destitute elderly senior citizens sexually exploited children and abandonedanimals.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided financial and operational support for youth soccer programs girls futsal initiatives educational outreach English learning leadership development and community development programs in the United States and Latin America including Colombia Brazil Paraguay Argentina Mexico. Continued development of the FutbolTech platform to support nonprofit youth sports organizations through technology communication educational tools and youth engagement services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.6%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 42.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.