Furry Village Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933274310
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Phone
8144341398
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$142,133
Expenses
$33,073
Assets
$499,613
Liabilities
$261,187

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • INNA DOROKHOVA (PRESIDENT, TREASURER, DIRE)
  • GRIGORIY GRIGORYAN (VICE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY,)

People named in this filing

  • INNA DOROKHOVA (PRESIDENT, TREASURER, DIRE)
  • GRIGORIY GRIGORYAN (VICE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY,)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sanctuary shelter for cats

What it reported doing in 2024

During 2023, furry village, inc. (the nonprofit) was organized for the charitable purpose of creating a sanctuary shelter for cats in order to provide rescue andrehabilitation services. The nonprofit will care for and offer a permanent sanctuary for cats and will adopt animals, especially older cats, from the local shelters that areabandoned or are not receiving the proper care, love, or attention.the nonprofit was able to secure a large donation of cash and stocks to help advance this mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 22
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 9.9%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 40.6%; rating input score 41

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 76.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.11; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 182.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 122.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 9.9% of revenue deployed · 40.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.