Fullness of God International Church Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475234745
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tucker, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4045793552
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $340,945
- Expenses
- $230,663
- Assets
- $232,686
- Liabilities
- $12,592
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BIRHAN C TABOR (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- BIRHAN C TABOR (CEO): $20,000 total reported compensation
- SURAFEL MESFIN ARGAW (CFO): $16,000 total reported compensation
- ZENITH M ARGAW (SECRETARY): $15,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The church is focusing teaching and preaching christianity and reach for those who are not christian. collaborating with other missionaries to expand the bible preaching and let people knows who Jesus Christ is
What it reported doing in 2024
It is church to spread the word of God and teaching the bible
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 35.5%; rating input score 35
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24% of revenue deployed · 35.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.