Fullertons Love of Orange County Kids (FLOCK)
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810702990
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Fullerton, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7144786152
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $269,860
- Expenses
- $143,652
- Assets
- $127,113
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Angela Joe (President)
People named in this filing
- Angela Joe (President)
- Michelle Perry (Treasurer)
- Colleen Joe (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Primary Exempt Purpose - Flock is a non-profitorganization whose specific purpose is to assist the homeless childrenof Orange County starting with our own backyard, Fulleron, California.For the homeless children under 12, we give out "Backpacks of Love"with a children's book, a stuffed animal. food and childhood essentialsfor their stay in a shelter or motel. FLOCK will also provide resourcesto homeless families to assist them to back into an apartment. Thechildren will be able to received scholarships for sports, tutoring andafter school programs so they can have a brighter future.
What it reported doing in 2025
Fullerton's Love of Orange County Kids, otherwise known as FLOCK, is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization whose mission is to end the cycle of child homelessness in Orange County. Specifically, FLOCK supports children who are identified as homeless through the McKinney-Vento Act. These kids lack a regular and adequate nighttime residence, which can have a huge impact on their ability to learn and succeed in their academic and personal environments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 30
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.9%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 97.5%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $345.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.8%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.9% of revenue deployed · 97.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $140K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.