Fullerton Dance Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453953292
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Fullerton, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7143050323
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,938
- Expenses
- $101,758
- Assets
- $41,984
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Veronica Rosas (President)
- Jessie Peissig (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Veronica Rosas (President)
- Jessie Peissig (Vice President)
- Erin Molino (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fullerton Dance Boosters supports the dance programs at Fullerton Union High School. The dance programs include Introductory and Intermediate dance classes taken for PE credit as well as Advanced Dance and the Dance Production Team who perform in workshops, concerts, competitions, and halftime shows. Boosters provides costumes, uniforms, props, meals, dance supplies and equipment, registration fees, summer programs, choreographer fees, coach payments, and classroom supplies to support these programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other program expenses include coach stipends, dancewear for team and PE classes, awards banquet, competition registrations, honor society and varsity patches, dance equipment, choreographers, senior recognition.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $93K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.