Full Tilt Print Studio Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
040482236
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Scituate, MA, USA
Phone
6173476015
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,416
Expenses
$48,522
Assets
$29,678
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARILYN MASE (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MARILYN MASE (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)
  • SUSAN DENNISTON (TREASURER & DIRECTOR)
  • MARGO LEMIEUX (CLERK & DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provision of a printmaking studio where members can meet and pursue their interests in etching, lithography and other printmaking techniques, creating an atmosphere that encourages artistic inspiration and growth through interaction & comraderie.

What it reported doing in 2025

Primary accomplishment is the sharing of a printmaking studio where members meet to share knowledge and equipment such as presses & plate cutters that would be prohibitive for an individual member to own. Additionally, the organization arranges with local art schools to provide outstanding students with opportunities to use the facilities. The organization also invites outstanding artists as guests for members to learn from them. The organization also hosts open studio events where members showcase and discuss their work with the public. The organization also arranges exchanges between it and other printmaking studios, and offers workshops to non-printmakers (eg. Curators & art educators) for them to observe different techniques and have the opportunity for hands-on experience. All activities of the organization are carried out by members on a volunteer basis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.